|
Panorama's Wide, Wide Take on Risk Managers' Needs
This new (and so far only) NT-driven total risk package
is developing a following.
By Andrew Webb
Panorama is SunGard Capital Markets' silver bullet for enterprise-wide
risk management. Unlike many other offerings in the field, it is not an
adaptation of an existing derivatives system but a de novo product four
years in the making. Panorama has two very distinguishing characteristics:
1) It runs principally under Windows NT; and 2) It is designed to be completely
nonintrusive to other systems already running front/back offices.
Several years ago the market manifested a wish for fully dedicated risk
systems. In thinking up an appropriate response, Ian Green, the head of
the Panorama development team, decided on a bold move at the outset: to
opt for a Windows NT platform. The decision encountered a certain amount
of resistance at first within SunGard-since NT was a very unproven entity-but
with the benefit of hindsight it seems Green made a good call on the right
operating system for his baby.
The three legs of the Panorama stool are Risk Database, Risk Executive
and Risk Workstation. The last two will run only on NT, while the Database
will run on either a UNIX/Sybase or Windows NT/SQL Server combination. The
Executive plays the pivotal role of handling incoming trade events from
other systems and passing them to the Database and Workstation. To do so,
it translates these events into its native Devon Data Model format by providing
a set of stored procedures for the external system to connect to. These
in turn write the event to a storage area where they can be manipulated
internally and validated before inclusion in the Database. The Executive
is thus a software layer that prevents invalid data from being included
in the Database, at the same time saving the user the effort of having to
write directly to the Devon Data Model. The Database allows the user to
build a risk archive for back-testing risk modeling and assumptions, while
the Workstation provides a broad selection of analytical and reporting functions.
The Risk Executive is conceptually attractive from an implementation
viewpoint. It has also given SunGard's development team an enormous amount
of extra elbow room, since it allows them to use their own data model. The
most obvious benefit of this is the quite extraordinary level of flexibility
in Panorama, which largely springs from its ability to break deals down
into their smallest component parts. "Data decomposition" might
describe this process, but doesn't quite. It's more like "data disintegration."
Deals can not only belong to many different portfolios simultaneously, they
can also be split into their component cash flows. The user is not obliged
to use just one curve when pricing deals; individual items can price off
different curves. The portfolio concept really allows the risk manager to
see every possible risk implication of a transaction. Because a deal can
belong to numerous portfolios, one can quickly see its impact not only in
different areas such as credit, basis or FX risk, but also at different
levels within an organization, such as trader, department or division.
The "risk archive" concept directly addresses one of the most
fundamental issues of risk management, to wit: It's all very well making
risk assumptions now, but how valid have those assumptions been in the past?
The ability to carry out detailed historical back-testing using the material
archived in the Risk Database allows the user to check the robustness of
these assumptions. There are, to be sure, some gaps in Panorama. The lack
of facilities for mortgage-backed securities is probably the most obvious.
As yet, path-dependent options are not covered either, though there are
rumors that this gap is due to be plugged shortly.
Panorama is a robust solution that slots neatly into a gap in the market between the utilitarian and exotic approaches to risk management. The functionality
and flexibility are undoubtedly impressive, but they are only a product
of what is clearly the most striking feature, the architecture. By getting
the foundations of Panorama dead right, SunGard have given themselves almost
unlimited scope for future expansion.
Users Speak
Guenter Nerlich
Chief of Staff, Basler Kantonalbank, Basle, Switzerland
We chose Panorama because we wanted an integral solution for the front,
back and middle office. Our main objective was to minimize project risk
by reducing the number of different interfaces required, so SunGard's ability
to provide a complete package was very important. In some ways we are not
the typical customer, since ours is a completely new bank trading room-a
comparatively rare event. In the end it was a near-easy decision, because
Panorama has one of the best solutions available among the vendors we considered.
The fact that Panorama runs principally under Windows NT was also a significant consideration, though we will be running the Risk Database on a UNIX/Sybase
platform. The system will be implemented in a completely new 55-position
trading floor here in Basle that will go live on December 2, with completion
scheduled for late February. The total investment is around Sf20 million.
The flexibility of the system is an attractive feature. We like the ability to build multiple portfolios and the possibility of expanding Panorama across
all trading activities. We shall be using its capabilities to the full and
will be making use of such things as the Custom House extensions. This was
another important part of our buy decision.
Gregor Aminoff
Head of IT, Swedish National Debt Office, Stockholm, Sweden
The Swedish National Debt Office needs an integrated front, middle and
back office system. We also plan to connect some of our specialized systems,
such as our issuing and auction system. Deals will be entered through the
Devon System in which we have made some enhancements. It will effectively
provide us with a real-time link to Panorama. We had a number of small proprietary
systems, which we wanted to leave for a number of reasons, that can be connected
to Panorama.
When making the purchasing decision, we went for functionality first.
Technical environment and cost were considered at a much later stage. The
fact that Panorama runs under Windows NT definitely made the selection easier,
as we already had it here. We didn't really want to go for UNIX on the front
end. I think NT is a wise direction to go in the market, but we still put
functionality first.
Panorama's setup and conceptualization is first rate. Because it is a
replicated data base, you don't ever have to risk manipulating real data.
There is no chance of asking silly SQL questions, killing the data base
and getting bad performance for the traders, etc. It also has a lot of advanced
analytical functions.
Quentin Storrs-Fox
American Express Bank
There are six aspects of Panorama that particularly appeal to me: the
ability to capture transactional data from legacy systems; SunGard's concept
of a portfolio; the integration of market valuation, market risk, credit
risk and capital adequacy; source of change and risk archiving; analytics;
and value-at-risk methodology.
Data capture. Dealing with legacy systems is, without doubt, one
of the key challenges facing any institution implementing a risk management
system. Panorama addresses this challenge through the robust Risk Executive
with its open interface and the ability to enter transactional data into
Panorama through Excel spreadsheets. Of course the user will have to preprocess
data from legacy systems in order for the transaction to be accepted by
the Risk Executive.
I like the fact that it is the original transaction-not a position or
cash flow derived from the transaction or set of transactions-that is passed
to the Panorama database. This is clearly an advantage for, say, a risk
manager based in New York who has no access to legacy systems in other parts
of the world. This means he can "drill down" to a particular transaction
done in a particular country with a particular client.
Portfolios. A limitation in many existing systems is the need
to assign a particular trade to a portfolio. This then forces people to
look at exposure from only one standpoint, which may not be appropriate
when assessing risk. Panorama neatly sidesteps this limitation by not assigning
transactions to portfolios. Instead, all trades on the system are available
to the user at all times, and portfolios are constructed by selecting trades
according to specified criteria from the data base. These criteria (Selection
Rules, in Panorama) can then be saved and are classified as "portfolios."
As a result, a trade can reside in many portfolios, and the user can look
at overall exposure from different standpoints.
The integration of market valuation, market risk, credit risk and
capital adequacy. The limit capability within Panorama is impressive.
Basically, any value calculated or reported in the system-be it notional,
market value, VAR, delta, gamma and so on-can have a limit set against it
at the transaction, trader, desk, counterparty, profit center, etc. Not
only is it possible to make these formula-driven, but they are also reported
in real time. Add to this the ability to define netting agreements in terms
of parent, child, grandchild and guarantor (although I am not sure how this
integrates with portfolio selection) and you have a potentially powerful
credit risk system.
Source of change and risk archiving. Panorama allows the user
to archive all market, position, valuation, volatility, correlation and
calculated results data on a daily basis in what are called Risk Archives.
SunGard's recommendation is that only one Risk Archive be saved each day-that
is, the total portfolio. The only limitation to the number of Risk Archives
that can be saved is available disk space on the server. It is then possible
for the user to use the same selection rules for creating portfolios against
the archives in order to generate multiple views (again, all of which can
be saved).
Not only is this essential for back-testing, but SunGard have also added Source of Change functionality to this. In other words, Panorama will analyze,
on a day-to-day basis (a weekly or monthly basis may also be selected),
what caused the value of the portfolio to change. This includes changes
due to new, canceled and amended trades, changes due to interest rates,
FX rates and realized profit and loss, as well as a number of second-order
factors.
Analytics. There are powerful analytics, not only in terms of
instrument and portfolio valuation (including perfect and practical hedging)
but also in terms of scenario analysis and stress testing. Again, like everything
else in the system, scenario analyses and stress testing parameters can
be saved for future use by the individual user. Additionally, proprietary
pricing libraries can also be attached.
Value-at-risk methodology. The system currently offers a co-variance methodology. While this is offered by many other systems, Panorama gives
the user not only an unlimited number of currencies and interest rates,
but also multiple confidence level and holding periods, plus delta-gamma-vega
analysis of all options. VAR can be calculated on any portfolio, which in
Panorama means at the total institution level right down to an individual
transaction or counterparty level. VAR limits can also be set at all these
levels.
Conclusion. The system is impressive, the architecture robust
and the approach to tackling enterprise-wide risk management a credit to
the development team. It is quite clear, however, that this is a system
that needs an experienced driver. Its very flexibility makes it a complex
system to set up and use. For example, the ability to change a single factor
in the correlation matrix-without regard to the consequences of doing so-could
make it a dangerous tool in the hands of an amateur. Overall, this is a
system that deserves serious consideration by any institution looking for
a risk management solution.
For three years Quentin D. Storrs-Fox has been global risk manager
for American Express Bank. He has been with the bank since 1984, and previously
worked for the Trade Development Bank (London).
Since this review was written, American Express Bank has purchased
Panorama.
George Haddad
Ernst & Young
A caveat is in order. To call this review a "test drive" of
Panorama is unfair. It is more like looking at a new car in a showroom.
A bona fide test would take several weeks, comparing the system against
the competition with a full range of trades.
Stand-alone uniqueness. SunGard has created in Panorama a unique, stand-alone product that does not require connection to any other Devon or Renaissance
product. Panorama is a result of an independent development project. Accordingly,
important decisions regarding programming languages, platforms, data bases
and analytics had to be made. Panorama is built using Visual C++, capitalizing
on the "openness" that object-oriented systems bring.
With respect to platforms, Devon gambled and developed the core system
to be run on Windows NT, and it is currently the only risk management system
to run native on NT. This decision may prove to be a wise one with many
institutions moving "back to the future" to high-powered PCs and
to client-server/Internet environments and away from a workstation-only
focus. Panorama's deal data base can either be Microsoft SQL running on
Windows NT or Sybase running UNIX on a workstation.
Panorama uses the Devon Data Model, offering the Custom House module
to facilitate the extension to proprietary models. Custom House is a software
development kit for writing OLE (object-linking and embedding) calculation
objects. These OLE calculation objects allow the system to communicate with
other objects, such as a pricing model or a user defined yield curve. The
object may even contain C code, which can allow for the "breaking down"
and reuse of existing pricing models in legacy systems. Traders also have
the ability to link to Panorama the spreadsheets that they rely on.
With respect to "firmwide VAR systems," some of the main issues are product coverage, integration/migration and what risk analyses are performed.
Excepting mortgage-backed products, Panorama handles the majority of the
vanilla and exotic products traded in the marketplace.
Legacy interfaces. Panorama addresses the integration aspect of firmwide risk with their Risk Executive module. The Risk Executive facilitates the
integration of information from various systems to Panorama. SunGard feels
that this module will reduce the amount of time to achieve interface with
legacy systems. One component of the Risk Executive module assists in the
mapping of data within an existing system to the format that Panorama is
looking for. Another component monitors deals as they flow into the system
and performs an "integrity check" to determine if the data falls
within certain boundaries. The most seamless integration of data occurs
where Panorama is connected to Devon Derivatives Systems, with Panorama
updated "live" as new deals are entered into the trading system.
Integrating multiplatform, multilocation non-Devon systems, however, creates
a bigger challenge. SunGard believes this challenge can be overcome with
integration teams from either or both the Panorama purchaser or consultants
charged with focusing on IT and data migration/integration issues.
Potentially the Risk Executive Module's ability to access global data
bases and update portfolios, including amendments, could be a solution to
a lot of the integration, migration and aggregation issues associated with
VAR.
Credit controls. In addition to performing market risk analysis, Panorama offers some Credit Risk "control" and regulatory reporting features.
The system performs a variety of customer limit monitoring, with the ability
to incorporate relationships between counterparties, guarantor and netting
provisions. This limit monitoring can be performed in real time. There is,
however, more to credit risk than limits and regulatory reporting. The ability
to perform detailed credit analysis utilizing formulas that incorporate
risk weightings with Monte Carlo, or some another simulation tool, is lacking
in Panorama, though future releases could remedy this quickly thanks to
Panorama's modularity.
In essence Panorama attempts to offer the strengths of a turnkey solution and an open object-oriented environment. The system sacrifices the "sexy
GUI" for a more standard, easy-to-use Microsoft Excel spreadsheet look
and feel. Panorama seems to be an easy system to use, which is an important
characteristic for traders and risk managers alike.
George M. Haddad, a manager in Ernst & Young's Northeast Management Consulting Practice, previously was a manager of client services for C*ATS
Software, and before that was a treasury officer at Chemical Bank, where
he put in seven years in derivatives systems.
Ken Young
Technology Solutions Company
Risk Executive. The Risk Executive is the nerve center for all Panorama
data integration and normalization. All contributing systems call the Risk
Executive to invoke its procedures in order to populate the Risk Database.
Specialized routines exist to perform all of the necessary inserts and updates
to the data base for both trade and reference data (for example, add a deal,
adjust a trade, add a counterparty). These routines can be invoked real-time
or in batch mode depending on the source environment and the risk management
requirements. However, no ability exists to extend or change the inbound
data formats, or to update event procedures of the Risk Executive, without
vendor assistance.
Risk Database. Risk Database was designed with advanced query and analysis capabilities in mind. This ability to dynamically select portfolio parameters
is a key user requirement that is found in few risk management systems on
the market today. Panorama extends dynamic portfolio selection by providing
advanced filtering capabilities that allow for virtually any combination
of numeric, descriptive or date fields. The Risk Workstation allows the
combining of filtering rules and provides an intuitive display of results
that are partitioned in a familiar spreadsheet format.
Within Panorama's Risk Archives, historical information concerning market rates, volatilities, portfolios and transactions is stored at the detailed
portfolio level. This allows for a broad range of historical analysis (for
example, VAR and RAROC). In addition, Panorama's "source of change"
analysis allows the user to isolate the change agents of a portfolio and
analyze only those items that contributed to the portfolio's change over
some period defined by the user. The Risk Database tables can also be extended
by the user. With Risk Executive, however, the limitations on extensibility
would, in most cases, require a vendor change to populate a new field.
Risk Workstation. The Risk Workstation is the visual part of the system
and appears friendly while offering a comprehensive set of analysis tools.
A third-party graphic program is embedded seamlessly into Panorama and offers
a host of graphical presentations of risk management data.
Considerable thought went into the design of the reference data setup
module. Each user of the system can create a personal set of defaults for
each product monitored by the system. Users also have the ability to create
custom pricing rules and easily assign, or deny, other users access to the
newly created rules. Scenario analysis is facilitated through the creation
of scenario portfolios that can be adjusted to "what-if" market
conditions and/or additional trade activity.
Conclusion. With this product SunGard has succeeded with all of the core components of risk management data integration, modeling/storage and presentation.
Overall the product appears extremely usable and intuitive, suitable for
its broad target audience of risk managers. It tackles many difficult data
integration issues and provides a cornerstone of standardization for a top-down
risk management solution.
Kenneth Young is a vice president at TSC with 11 years' background
in fixed income and equity derivative products. At Bank of Boston he was
project manager on a fixed income trading system, and previously worked
on financial systems at Barnett Bank.
Panorama
An enterprise-wide real-time risk management system that starts at seven figures.
Available from: SunGard Capital Markets
560 Lexington Ave., 10th floor, New York, NY 10022
Tel: (212) 371-1116; Fax: (212) 371-1148
Was this information valuable?
Subscribe to Derivatives Strategy by clicking here!
|
|
|